Kate Winslet Upset Over Posing on Real Fur In Vanity Fair Magazine
Can You Tell the Difference Between Real and Faux Fur?
I can. But, according to sources, Kate Winslet, an anti-fur advocate, didn't feel the difference when posing au naturel for Vanity Fair. Pre-photo shoot, the magazine told Winslet the blanket was faux. In reality she was posing on a $14,677 silver fox Frette fur throw. Vanity Fair has apologized to the actress for the major mix-up. But we're wondering: Would you be able to tell the difference between real and faux?

Tell your friends
Link Love
- Rihanna demands $5 millon over t-shirtHuffPost Style
- Terry Richardson channels Gatsby glamour for Interview Germany — Styleite
- This former model is making her acting debut at Cannes — The Daily Beast
- The 21st-century corset craze — People StyleWatch
- What's your weekend style personality? — Lifestyle Mirror
- Candice Swanepoel lands Vogue Australia's June cover — TFS
- Will David Beckham launch a menswear line? — Vogue UK
- These website return policies can't be beat — Lucky
- The exquisite jewels Cartier re-created for Nicole Kidman — Racked
56 Comments