Featured
See by Chloe Embroidered Denim Short: Love It or Hate It?
There's only a certain time in the year when you can get away with wearing short shorts; now is the time. These See by Chloe Embroidered Denim Short ($410) offer a fun twist to the classic cut-off but at that expensive price, I'm hoping everything is hand stitched. Do you love these shorts or are they a rip-off?
Take all of my Love It or Hate It Polls here! To post your selections go to the Love It or Hate It? group. And if you want to learn how to do a blog post click here.
39 Comments Post a Comment
More on FabSugar
Spring
Top Brands
NARS
i think i had these in 4th grade.
1Not a fan.
2these remind me of the kind of shorts i used to love...when i was about 10
they're very young, very short, and very very expensive
3i wouldn't pay that much for shorts even if i was in love with them
sort of cute... but too short and WAY to much dinero!
4Looks like something Mischa Barton would wear. I don't like it at all
5love, but you'd have to be careful how you wear it. you want to look fresh, not 5. i'd do it with some gladiators and a peasant-y (but not too frilly) top, i think. now if only i could AFFORD them!
6These are just ridiculous in every way.
7Embroidered Denim is always a no.
8It looks like something Angela Keslar on Project Runway Season 3 would have done. Very cheesy and homemade.
9I would totally wear it if (and that's a big IF) I had model legs, what I'm completely not even close to have.
10less is more
11Umm $410 for glorified daisy dukes is insane I think not! The styling as some have said is juvenile and no young girl should be paying 410 for shorts or any article of clothing for that matter!
12For that money I'd want to get something actually fashionable and age-appropriate.
13Too much money for something much too juvinile.
14what am i? seven?
15Fug
16Yikes... just yikes.
17Gross.
18wow, I would SOOO wear these, they're so cute! I'm actually surprised to see you girls don't like them... I agree that the price is absolutely nonsense though.
19One word, Hannis!!!!!!!
20Definitely looks like something I wore as a kid in the mid-80s.
21I love it.
22they look like something from a souvenir shop out west. Like kinda 50's, kinda southwest, kinda old-lady. yuck!
23I voted love it, *BUT*! ONLY for a much younger girl. On a fully grown babe? Not so much. lol
24ewww - awful shorts, awful price...
25Very cute for a little girl.
26But too $$$!
No way. I wore these when I was 12. I would not wear these now or spend that kind of money on them.
27too mischa barton for my taste!!
28nice if your 5...
29why?!?
30Eck. I wouldn't buy these shorts even if they were 10cents in a bargin bin; just ugly.
31i THINK THEY ARE VERY BEAUTIFUL. i LIKE THEM A LOT BUT ARE F***ING EXPENCIVE!!
32MY GOD! MORE THAN 400$ FOR A PAIR OF SHORT?? iT'S RIDICULOUS!!
Its alright...if we were still in the 1970s!
33Undecided. It depends on the rest of the outfit. With the right top, shoes, and accessories it can look cute and fun.
34Ummm no.
35i think i have that ....hmmm..only not that style ..... it looks just for kids....
36noooo....
37hmm.... let me think.... NO!
38??????????
39Post New Comment
Please share your opinion with our community, but make sure it is on topic and follows our Community Rules. We moderate comments and prohibit personal attacks, threats, spam, lewd images, or the promotion of your personal website.